Well, maybe it is, and maybe it ain’t.
“No – no – I reckon it wouldn’t hardly do, Ben. You see, Aunt Polly’s awful particular about this fence – right here on the street, you know – but if it was the back fence I wouldn’t mind and she wouldn’t. Yes, she’s awful particular about this fence; it’s got to be done very careful; I reckon there ain’t one boy in a thousand, maybe two thousand, that can do it the way it’s got to be done.”
Last 5 posts by the editor
- BREAKING: WI Roadside Collection of Dead Deer May Cease - December 17th, 2008
- law of corpse and carcass update #2 - August 4th, 2008
- 1L Callback - June 23rd, 2008
- law of corpse and carcass update - June 16th, 2008
- another bright idea - June 2nd, 2008
towniewannabe said,
June 12, 2007 @ 3:48 pm
Okay - do you know something about this that I don’t? They aren’t making decisions about this yet, are they? If this is happening now or soon, everyone needs to lie to me or something - keep me in the dark.
the editor said,
June 12, 2007 @ 4:35 pm
What I know is that it’s a scam, perpetuating the unhealthy, status-obsessed myopia of the legal profession. Constant striving and competition for “prestige” — in this case, for permission to perform hours of unpaid, mindless, drudging labor, correcting the references to other works in tedious articles no reasonable person reads or uses. What sort of sick system produces something like a law review: a continuing, meaningless competition masquerading as a publication. Law reviews exist first and foremost as means to advance the careers of the people who participate in it, not to disseminate knowledge or improve the law, Those who maintain otherwise are lying or deluded.
I also know who was chosen to staff the various law reviews and journals: suckers. However, I don’t have any specific information as to which individual suckers were or were not chosen, though.