chicago produces my kind of hypotheticals
This lack of substantive distinction is more clearly seen in the light of the following hypothetical situation. Assuming, for instance, that an individual stops at a neighborhood tavern to purchase a six-packĀ of beer to take out and, while there, also decides to purchase a 12-ounce bottle of beer to drink at the bar. Under the provisions of the ordinance before us, when he receives his total bill, he will be charged no tax for the six cans of beer but will be required to pay 6 cents tax for theĀ bottle of beer.
North Sheffield, Inc. v. Chicago, 144 Ill. App. 3d 913, 919-920 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1986)
Last 5 posts by the editor
- law of corpse and carcass update #2 - August 4th, 2008
- 1L Callback - June 23rd, 2008
- law of corpse and carcass update - June 16th, 2008
- another bright idea - June 2nd, 2008
- A series of pre-pontiac conferences - May 22nd, 2008